Re: [PATCH 13/18] mm, hugetlb: grab a page_table_lock after page_cache_release

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:32:04PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > We don't need to grab a page_table_lock when we try to release a page. > So, defer to grab a page_table_lock. > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c > index

Re: [PATCH 13/18] mm, hugetlb: grab a page_table_lock after page_cache_release

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:32:04PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: We don't need to grab a page_table_lock when we try to release a page. So, defer to grab a page_table_lock. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com diff --git

[PATCH 13/18] mm, hugetlb: grab a page_table_lock after page_cache_release

We don't need to grab a page_table_lock when we try to release a page. So, defer to grab a page_table_lock. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 35ccdad..255bd9e 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -2630,10 +2630,11 @@ retry_avoidcopy: }

[PATCH 13/18] mm, hugetlb: grab a page_table_lock after page_cache_release

We don't need to grab a page_table_lock when we try to release a page. So, defer to grab a page_table_lock. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 35ccdad..255bd9e 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -2630,10 +2630,11 @@