Re: [PATCH 13/24] net, diet: Make GRO offload optional

2014-05-05 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 11:01:18PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Andi Kleen > Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 15:26:02 -0700 > > > It's not needed on small systems. > > On the contrary, I would expect the performance gains from > batching the packet receive path to be even larger on slow > small com

Re: [PATCH 13/24] net, diet: Make GRO offload optional

2014-05-05 Thread David Miller
From: Andi Kleen Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 15:26:02 -0700 > It's not needed on small systems. On the contrary, I would expect the performance gains from batching the packet receive path to be even larger on slow small computers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ker

[PATCH 13/24] net, diet: Make GRO offload optional

2014-05-05 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen Make the GRO offload code optional. It's not needed on small systems. Since it's not a single file there are a couple of ifdefs. Some code is still there (not ifdef'ed) but can be removed now with LTO. Without LTO it gives about 3K. textdata bss dec hex fil