Arnd Bergmann writes:
> I don't know exactly how the probing works, but I'd assume that we have
> the correct device pointers in pxa2xx_ac97_dev_probe() and
> asoc_ssp_probe(), or maybe in pxa2xx_ac97_*_startup() and
> pxa_ssp_startup().
Yes, let's try this way, in the former
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> I don't know exactly how the probing works, but I'd assume that we have
> the correct device pointers in pxa2xx_ac97_dev_probe() and
> asoc_ssp_probe(), or maybe in pxa2xx_ac97_*_startup() and
> pxa_ssp_startup().
Yes, let's try this way, in the former patch
"ASoC: pxa:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
>> I'm still unable to follow through that code, but I understand now that
>> the device you pass to dma_request_slave_channel() is not the one
>> we'd like it to be here.
>>
>>
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
>> I'm still unable to follow through that code, but I understand now that
>> the device you pass to dma_request_slave_channel() is not the one
>> we'd like it to be here.
>>
>> Where exactly does that call to
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> I'm still unable to follow through that code, but I understand now that
> the device you pass to dma_request_slave_channel() is not the one
> we'd like it to be here.
>
> Where exactly does that call to dma_request_chan() happen? Is this
> the one in
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> I'm still unable to follow through that code, but I understand now that
> the device you pass to dma_request_slave_channel() is not the one
> we'd like it to be here.
>
> Where exactly does that call to dma_request_chan() happen? Is this
> the one in dmaengine_pcm_new()?
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
> chop chop ... removed several mail recipients to leave only the ASoC / PXA
> subset ...
>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik
>> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
> chop chop ... removed several mail recipients to leave only the ASoC / PXA
> subset ...
>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> +static struct pxa_ssp_info pxa_ssp_infos[] = {
>>>
Arnd Bergmann writes:
chop chop ... removed several mail recipients to leave only the ASoC / PXA
subset ...
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
>>
>> +static struct pxa_ssp_info pxa_ssp_infos[] = {
>> + { .dma_chan_rx_name =
Arnd Bergmann writes:
chop chop ... removed several mail recipients to leave only the ASoC / PXA
subset ...
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
>>
>> +static struct pxa_ssp_info pxa_ssp_infos[] = {
>> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp1_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp1_tx",
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> +static struct pxa_ssp_info pxa_ssp_infos[] = {
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp1_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp1_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp1_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp1_tx", },
> + {
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> +static struct pxa_ssp_info pxa_ssp_infos[] = {
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp1_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp1_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name = "ssp1_rx", .dma_chan_tx_name = "ssp1_tx", },
> + { .dma_chan_rx_name =
In order to prepare for the dma_slave_map change for SSP DMA channels
allocation, the SSP platform devices will now include a platform data
structure which in turn selects which dma channel has to be used for
data transfers, especially the PCM ones.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik
In order to prepare for the dma_slave_map change for SSP DMA channels
allocation, the SSP platform devices will now include a platform data
structure which in turn selects which dma channel has to be used for
data transfers, especially the PCM ones.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik
---
14 matches
Mail list logo