Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 02:04:41PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:14 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 08:11 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > > Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:14 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 08:11 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
> > > on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 08:11 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
> > on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor. Even on
> > other architectures, refrain from
On 2015-03-12 8:11 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor. Even on
other architectures, refrain from setting a bad example that
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
> on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor. Even on
> other architectures, refrain from setting a bad example that people
> copy.
Are you sure about this?
On 2015-03-12 8:11 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor. Even on
other architectures, refrain from setting a bad example that
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 08:11 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor. Even on
other architectures, refrain from setting a bad
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 02:04:41PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:14 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 08:11 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:14 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 08:11 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor.
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:13 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor. Even on
other architectures, refrain from setting a bad example that people
copy.
Are you sure about this?
Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor. Even on
other architectures, refrain from setting a bad example that people
copy.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
Cc: linux-par...@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/parisc/superio.c
Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor. Even on
other architectures, refrain from setting a bad example that people
copy.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
Cc: linux-par...@vger.kernel.org
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
