On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 02:02 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2007, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > There's also the error case for spu_run_init() which skips the master
> > stop. I guess that's ok because we've only set the master control in the
> > backing store, and the only way that
On Friday 02 March 2007, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> There's also the error case for spu_run_init() which skips the master
> stop. I guess that's ok because we've only set the master control in the
> backing store, and the only way that will ever get propagated to an
> actual spu is by coming back th
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 01 March 2007, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 18:45 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > plain text document attachment (spufs-master-control.diff)
> > > When the user changes the runcontrol register, an SPU migh
On Thursday 01 March 2007, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 18:45 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (spufs-master-control.diff)
> > When the user changes the runcontrol register, an SPU might be
> > running without a process being attached to it and waiti
On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 18:45 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> plain text document attachment (spufs-master-control.diff)
> When the user changes the runcontrol register, an SPU might be
> running without a process being attached to it and waiting for
> events. In order to prevent this, make sure we alw
5 matches
Mail list logo
