On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:52 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Most architectures define system call numbers for the rseq and pkey system
> > calls, even when they don't support the features, and perhaps never will.
>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Most architectures define system call numbers for the rseq and pkey system
> calls, even when they don't support the features, and perhaps never will.
>
> Only a few architectures are missing these, so just define them anyway
> for
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 06:30:43PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:36 PM Heiko Carstens
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Since you only need/want the system call numbers, could you please
> > change these lines to:
> >
> >
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:36 PM Heiko Carstens
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Since you only need/want the system call numbers, could you please
> change these lines to:
>
> > +384 common pkey_alloc - -
> >
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Most architectures define system call numbers for the rseq and pkey system
> calls, even when they don't support the features, and perhaps never will.
>
> Only a few architectures are missing these, so just define them anyway
> for
Most architectures define system call numbers for the rseq and pkey system
calls, even when they don't support the features, and perhaps never will.
Only a few architectures are missing these, so just define them anyway
for consistency. If we decide to add them later to one of these, the
system
6 matches
Mail list logo
