Re: [PATCH 15/19] x86/dumpstack: convert show_trace_log_lvl() to the new unwinder

2016-07-21 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 06:49:01AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:21:52PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > Convert show_trace_log_lvl() to the new unwinder. dump_trace() has been > > deprecated. > > > > show_trace_log_lvl() is special compared to other users of the unwi

Re: [PATCH 15/19] x86/dumpstack: convert show_trace_log_lvl() to the new unwinder

2016-07-21 Thread Byungchul Park
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:21:52PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > Convert show_trace_log_lvl() to the new unwinder. dump_trace() has been > deprecated. > > show_trace_log_lvl() is special compared to other users of the unwinder. > It's the only place where both reliable *and* unreliable addresses

[PATCH 15/19] x86/dumpstack: convert show_trace_log_lvl() to the new unwinder

2016-07-21 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
Convert show_trace_log_lvl() to the new unwinder. dump_trace() has been deprecated. show_trace_log_lvl() is special compared to other users of the unwinder. It's the only place where both reliable *and* unreliable addresses are needed. With frame pointers enabled, most stack walking code doesn't