On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:49 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:45:39PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski
> >
> > We're currently creating chips at module init time only so using a
> > static index for dummy devices is fine. We want to support dy
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 1:50 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 01:04:29PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:49 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:45:39PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 01:04:29PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:49 PM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:45:39PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski
> > >
> > > We're currently creating chips at module init time on
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:45:39PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski
>
> We're currently creating chips at module init time only so using a
> static index for dummy devices is fine. We want to support dynamically
> created chips however so we need to switch to dynamic
From: Bartosz Golaszewski
We're currently creating chips at module init time only so using a
static index for dummy devices is fine. We want to support dynamically
created chips however so we need to switch to dynamic device IDs.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.
5 matches
Mail list logo