On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 11:35 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 9:44 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > And I'd generally not bother with 80 column rewrapping
>
> Thanks for the quick answer Joe -- here I was referring to the cases
> where one needs to move all the `=`s to the right like:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 9:44 AM Joe Perches wrote:
>
> And I'd generally not bother with 80 column rewrapping
Thanks for the quick answer Joe -- here I was referring to the cases
where one needs to move all the `=`s to the right like:
static const struct file_operations memtype_fops = {
.open
On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 07:56 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 3:50 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Do you have a suggestion for an automated replacement which does?
> > I'll happily switch over to that.
>
> I guess I'd simply find the unique set of cases that occur and create
>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 3:50 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Do you have a suggestion for an automated replacement which does?
> I'll happily switch over to that.
I guess I'd simply find the unique set of cases that occur and create
a replacement for each manually. A handful of them or so may
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:46:17AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 10:25 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > Switch over all instances used directly as methods using these sed
> > expressions:
> >
> > sed -i -e
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 10:25 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Switch over all instances used directly as methods using these sed
> expressions:
>
> sed -i -e 's/\.read\(\s*=\s*\)seq_read/\.read_iter\1seq_read_iter/g'
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Nit: the replacements don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
