Em Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:56:28AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:39:40AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > What do I miss? Or where is it that I'm misinterpreting the calculations
> > > that objdump did in its output?
> >
> > The calculations are right, but these
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:39:40AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > What do I miss? Or where is it that I'm misinterpreting the calculations
> > that objdump did in its output?
>
> The calculations are right, but these are still two different address modes.
> You cannot just turn one silently int
> What do I miss? Or where is it that I'm misinterpreting the calculations
> that objdump did in its output?
The calculations are right, but these are still two different address modes.
You cannot just turn one silently into the other.
I think it would be ok to use the syntax in the assembler
sy
Em Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:20:43AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:01:11AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > Just like is done for 'mov' and others that can have as source or
> > targets variables resolved by objdump, to make th
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:01:11AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>
> Just like is done for 'mov' and others that can have as source or
> targets variables resolved by objdump, to make them more compact:
>
> - orb$0x4,0x224d71(%rip)
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Just like is done for 'mov' and others that can have as source or
targets variables resolved by objdump, to make them more compact:
- orb$0x4,0x224d71(%rip)# 226ca4 <_rtld_global+0xca4>
+ orb$0x4,_rtld_global+0xca4
Cc: A
6 matches
Mail list logo
