Re: [PATCH 17/19] dt-bindings: ipmi: Add optional SerIRQ property to ASPEED KCS devices

2021-03-08 Thread Andrew Jeffery
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021, at 09:39, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 12:55:21AM +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > Allocating IO and IRQ resources to LPC devices is in-theory an operation > > for the host, however ASPEED don't appear to expose this capability > > outside the BMC (e.g. SuperI

Re: [PATCH 17/19] dt-bindings: ipmi: Add optional SerIRQ property to ASPEED KCS devices

2021-03-05 Thread Rob Herring
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 12:55:21AM +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > Allocating IO and IRQ resources to LPC devices is in-theory an operation > for the host, however ASPEED don't appear to expose this capability > outside the BMC (e.g. SuperIO). Instead, we are left with BMC-internal > registers for m

[PATCH 17/19] dt-bindings: ipmi: Add optional SerIRQ property to ASPEED KCS devices

2021-02-19 Thread Andrew Jeffery
Allocating IO and IRQ resources to LPC devices is in-theory an operation for the host, however ASPEED don't appear to expose this capability outside the BMC (e.g. SuperIO). Instead, we are left with BMC-internal registers for managing these resources, so introduce a devicetree property for KCS devi