The cpufreq core supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper
for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it.
It should have no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <strat...@semaphore.gr>
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
index 85399c9..45ce065 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
@@ -1092,20 +1092,21 @@ int da850_register_cpufreq(char *async_clk)
static int da850_round_armrate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
{
- int i, ret = 0, diff;
+ int ret = 0, diff;
unsigned int best = (unsigned int) -1;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = cpufreq_info.freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
rate /= 1000; /* convert to kHz */
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- diff = table[i].frequency - rate;
+ cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, table) {
+ diff = pos->frequency - rate;
if (diff < 0)
diff = -diff;
if (diff < best) {
best = diff;
- ret = table[i].frequency;
+ ret = pos->frequency;
}
}
--
1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
