On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:53:50PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Could you please add a quick comment documenting the reqs_active field
> in the struct kioctx definition here? For future code
> maintainability, it should be documented in fs/aio.c, not just in a
> commit description.
I see this fi
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:35:38AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> The aio code tries really hard to avoid having to deal with the completion
> ringbuffer overflowing. To do that, it has to keep track of the number of
> outstanding kiocbs, and the number of completions currently in the
> ringbuffe
The aio code tries really hard to avoid having to deal with the completion
ringbuffer overflowing. To do that, it has to keep track of the number of
outstanding kiocbs, and the number of completions currently in the
ringbuffer - and it's got to check that every time we allocate a kiocb.
Ouch.
But
3 matches
Mail list logo