Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 2014-8-21 6:17, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:29:26PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2014-8-15 18:01, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>> Hanjun, >> >> Hi Catalin, >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:09:42AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: On 2014-8-14 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote: >

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:29:26PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2014-8-15 18:01, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Hanjun, > > Hi Catalin, > > > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:09:42AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> On 2014-8-14 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:21:25AM +010

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:00:25 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > +Clocks > +-- > + > +Like clocks that are part of the power resources there is no standard way > +to represent a clock tree in ACPI 5.1 in a similar manner to how it is > +described in DT. > + > +Devices affected by this include things li

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:29:26AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2014-8-15 18:01, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Hanjun, > > Hi Catalin, > > > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:09:42AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> On 2014-8-14 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:21:25AM +010

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 2014-8-15 18:01, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hanjun, Hi Catalin, > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:09:42AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2014-8-14 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:21:25AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: On 2014-8-14 7:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:49:44PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > What would be the process to get a clarification into the next version > of ACPI that makes them more distinct? > If you work for a UEFI member you can sign up to become a ASWG member on the UEFI webpage. You can then submit at ECR (

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

> Additional driver specific > +data should be passed in the appropriate _DSM (ACPI Section 9.14.1) method or > +_DSD (ACPI Section 6.2.5). Re: _DSD Yes. Re: _DSM No, not if it can be handled by _DSD. cheers, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

Hanjun, On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:09:42AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2014-8-14 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:21:25AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> On 2014-8-14 7:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 07:23:47 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 2014-8-14 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:21:25AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2014-8-14 7:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 07:23:47 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: If we consider ACPI unusable on ARM but we still want to start merging

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Thursday 14 August 2014 11:27:23 Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:21:25AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > On 2014-8-14 7:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 07:23:47 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: > > >> If we consider ACPI unusable on ARM but we still want

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:21:25AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2014-8-14 7:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 07:23:47 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: > >> If we consider ACPI unusable on ARM but we still want to start merging > >> patches, we should rather make the config opt

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 2014-8-14 7:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 07:23:47 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:27:52PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 05:27:50PM +0100, Olof Johansson wr

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:00:25PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Graeme Gregory > > Add documentation for the guidelines of how to use ACPI > on ARM64. > > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo > --- > Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt | 240 > +

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:19:14PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/24/2014 02:16 PM, Naresh Bhat wrote: > > > > On 24 July 2014 18:30, Hanjun Guo > > wrote: > > > > From: Graeme Gregory > > > > > > Add documentation for

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 28/07/2014 17:14, Andre Przywara wrote: On 28/07/14 16:23, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Monday 28 July 2014 15:20:06 Andre Przywara wrote: On 28/07/14 11:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Monday 28 July 2014 10:23:57 Graeme Gregory wrote: The PL011 UART is the use-case I keep hitting, that IP block

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 2014-7-28 17:07, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 26 July 2014 19:34:48 Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> +Relationship with Device Tree >>> +- >>> + >>> +ACPI support in drivers and subsystems for ARMv8 should never be

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 2014-7-27 10:34, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Graeme Gregory >> >> Add documentation for the guidelines of how to use ACPI >> on ARM64. > > As the most vocal participant against ACPI being adopted, I would have > appreciated a cc on this

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:23:40AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:42:57AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > >>+On no account should a Device Tree attempt to be replicated in ASL using > > >>such > > >>+constructs as Name(KEY0, "Value1") type constructs. Additional driver

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:07:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 26 July 2014 19:34:48 Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > > +Relationship with Device Tree > > > +- > > > + > > > +ACPI support in drivers and subsy

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:42:57AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > On 27/07/2014 03:34, Olof Johansson wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >>From: Graeme Gregory > >> > >>Add documentation for the guidelines of how to use ACPI > >>on ARM64. > >As the most vocal partic

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Monday 28 July 2014 15:20:06 Andre Przywara wrote: > On 28/07/14 11:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 28 July 2014 10:23:57 Graeme Gregory wrote: > >> The PL011 UART is the use-case I keep hitting, that IP block has a > >> variable input clock on pretty much everything I have seen in the w

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 28/07/14 11:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 28 July 2014 10:23:57 Graeme Gregory wrote: >> The PL011 UART is the use-case I keep hitting, that IP block has a >> variable input clock on pretty much everything I have seen in the wild. > > Ok, I see. What does ACPI-5.1 say about pl011? > >

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Monday 28 July 2014 10:23:57 Graeme Gregory wrote: > The PL011 UART is the use-case I keep hitting, that IP block has a > variable input clock on pretty much everything I have seen in the wild. Ok, I see. What does ACPI-5.1 say about pl011? Interestingly, the subset of pl011 that is specifie

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 28/07/2014 10:07, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Saturday 26 July 2014 19:34:48 Olof Johansson wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: +Relationship with Device Tree +- + +ACPI support in drivers and subsystems for ARMv8 should never be mutually +excl

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On Saturday 26 July 2014 19:34:48 Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > +Relationship with Device Tree > > +- > > + > > +ACPI support in drivers and subsystems for ARMv8 should never be mutually > > +exclusive with DT support at

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 27/07/2014 03:34, Olof Johansson wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: From: Graeme Gregory Add documentation for the guidelines of how to use ACPI on ARM64. As the most vocal participant against ACPI being adopted, I would have appreciated a cc on this patch set -- i

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

Hi Randy, Thank you for your careful review comments, I will update it in next version :) Best Regards Hanjun On 2014-7-25 4:42, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/24/2014 06:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Graeme Gregory >> >> Add documentation for the guidelines of how to use ACPI >> on ARM64. >>

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 07/24/2014 02:16 PM, Naresh Bhat wrote: > > On 24 July 2014 18:30, Hanjun Guo > wrote: > > From: Graeme Gregory > > > Add documentation for the guidelines of how to use ACPI > on ARM64. > > Signed-off-by: Graem

Re: [PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

On 07/24/2014 06:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Graeme Gregory > > Add documentation for the guidelines of how to use ACPI > on ARM64. > > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo > --- > Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt | 240 > ++ > 1

[PATCH 19/19] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

From: Graeme Gregory Add documentation for the guidelines of how to use ACPI on ARM64. Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo --- Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt | 240 ++ 1 file changed, 240 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentatio