On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 04:45:46PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 04:30:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >>>o Extend the bzImage protocol (same as i386) to allow bzImage loaders to
> >>> load the protected mode kernel at non-1M
Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 04:30:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Vivek Goyal wrote:
o Extend the bzImage protocol (same as i386) to allow bzImage loaders to
load the protected mode kernel at non-1MB address. Now protected mode
component is relocatable and can be loaded at no
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 04:30:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> >o Extend the bzImage protocol (same as i386) to allow bzImage loaders to
> > load the protected mode kernel at non-1MB address. Now protected mode
> > component is relocatable and can be loaded at non-1MB
Vivek Goyal wrote:
o Extend the bzImage protocol (same as i386) to allow bzImage loaders to
load the protected mode kernel at non-1MB address. Now protected mode
component is relocatable and can be loaded at non-1MB addresses.
o As of today kdump uses it to run a second kernel from a reserv
o Extend the bzImage protocol (same as i386) to allow bzImage loaders to
load the protected mode kernel at non-1MB address. Now protected mode
component is relocatable and can be loaded at non-1MB addresses.
o As of today kdump uses it to run a second kernel from a reserved memory
area.
S
5 matches
Mail list logo