On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 10:09 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. Januar 2007 10:02 schrieb Peter Zijlstra:
> > Its a fundamental property of a mutex, not a shortcoming. A mutex has an
> > owner, the one that takes and releases the resource. This allows things
> > such as Priority Inherita
Am Dienstag, 9. Januar 2007 10:02 schrieb Peter Zijlstra:
> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 13:28 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Please use mutexes where possible. Semaphores should only be used when
> > their counting feature is employed. And, arguably, in situations where a
> > lock is locked and unl
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 13:28 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Please use mutexes where possible. Semaphores should only be used when
> their counting feature is employed. And, arguably, in situations where a
> lock is locked and unlocked from different threads, because this presently
> triggers mute
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:13:11 -0500
"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Josef "Jeff" Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch contains many macros and inline functions used thoughout Unionfs.
>
> ..
>
> +#define ibstart(ino) (UNIONFS_I(ino)->bstart)
> +#define ibend(ino) (UNIO
From: Josef "Jeff" Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch contains many macros and inline functions used thoughout Unionfs.
Signed-off-by: Josef "Jeff" Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Quigley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/fanout.h |
5 matches
Mail list logo