Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] kselftest: timers: Add adjtick test to validate adjtimex() tick adjustments

2015-09-09 Thread John Stultz
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:57:06PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: >> Recently an issue was reported that was difficult to detect except >> by tweaking the adjtimex tick value, and noticing how quickly the >> adjustment took to be made: >>

Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] kselftest: timers: Add adjtick test to validate adjtimex() tick adjustments

2015-09-09 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:57:06PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > Recently an issue was reported that was difficult to detect except > by tweaking the adjtimex tick value, and noticing how quickly the > adjustment took to be made: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/1/488 > > Thus this patch

[PATCH 2/2][RFC] kselftest: timers: Add adjtick test to validate adjtimex() tick adjustments

2015-09-09 Thread John Stultz
Recently an issue was reported that was difficult to detect except by tweaking the adjtimex tick value, and noticing how quickly the adjustment took to be made: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/1/488 Thus this patch introduces a new test which manipulates the adjtimex tick value and validates

[PATCH 2/2][RFC] kselftest: timers: Add adjtick test to validate adjtimex() tick adjustments

2015-09-09 Thread John Stultz
Recently an issue was reported that was difficult to detect except by tweaking the adjtimex tick value, and noticing how quickly the adjustment took to be made: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/1/488 Thus this patch introduces a new test which manipulates the adjtimex tick value and validates

Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] kselftest: timers: Add adjtick test to validate adjtimex() tick adjustments

2015-09-09 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:57:06PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > Recently an issue was reported that was difficult to detect except > by tweaking the adjtimex tick value, and noticing how quickly the > adjustment took to be made: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/1/488 > > Thus this patch

Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] kselftest: timers: Add adjtick test to validate adjtimex() tick adjustments

2015-09-09 Thread John Stultz
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:57:06PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: >> Recently an issue was reported that was difficult to detect except >> by tweaking the adjtimex tick value, and noticing how quickly the >> adjustment took