On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:51:21PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> Replacement second-in-series patch:
>
> This patch fixes up memory leaks and, by delaying initialisation, makes
> device detection more robust.
>
> It also makes clearer the difference between struct maple_device and
> struct dev
Replacement second-in-series patch:
This patch fixes up memory leaks and, by delaying initialisation, makes
device detection more robust.
It also makes clearer the difference between struct maple_device and
struct device, as well as cleaning up the interrupt request code
(without changing its fun
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:05:14PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 15:01 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:53:51PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > > - dev->function = function;
> > > - dev->dev.bus = &maple_bus_type;
> > > - dev->dev.parent = &maple_b
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 15:01 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:53:51PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > - dev->function = function;
> > - dev->dev.bus = &maple_bus_type;
> > - dev->dev.parent = &maple_bus;
> > - dev->dev.release = &maple_release_device;
> > - retval = d
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:53:51PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> - dev->function = function;
> - dev->dev.bus = &maple_bus_type;
> - dev->dev.parent = &maple_bus;
> - dev->dev.release = &maple_release_device;
> - retval = device_register(&dev->dev);
> - if (retval) {
> -
This patch fixes up memory leaks and, by delaying initialisation, makes
device detection more robust.
It also makes clearer the difference between struct maple_device and
struct device, as well as cleaning up the interrupt request code
(without changing its function in any way).
Signed-off by: Ad
6 matches
Mail list logo
