Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mvebu: Enable ARCH_WANT_LIBATA_LEDS in Armada 38x

2018-09-25 Thread Aditya Prayoga
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:26 PM Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2018-09-19 11:45:30, Aditya Prayoga wrote: > > Enable hidden symbol ARCH_WANT_LIBATA_LEDS so CONFIG_ATA_LEDS can be > > used in kernel configuration. > > Should that be hidden symbol and should that be architecture specific? > The int

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mvebu: Enable ARCH_WANT_LIBATA_LEDS in Armada 38x

2018-09-20 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2018-09-19 11:45:30, Aditya Prayoga wrote: > Enable hidden symbol ARCH_WANT_LIBATA_LEDS so CONFIG_ATA_LEDS can be > used in kernel configuration. Should that be hidden symbol and should that be architecture specific? For a notebook, I may want scrolllock LED to indicate ATA activity (becau

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: mvebu: Enable ARCH_WANT_LIBATA_LEDS in Armada 38x

2018-09-18 Thread Aditya Prayoga
Enable hidden symbol ARCH_WANT_LIBATA_LEDS so CONFIG_ATA_LEDS can be used in kernel configuration. URL: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt- devel/2017-March/006582.html Signed-off-by: Aditya Prayoga --- arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arc