On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:36:15PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I was indeed wondering whether the intel-dsp-config.c is just
> another layering violation: this is another generic piece
> of code that seems to contain too much knowledge about
> specific hardware implementations.
The purpose of
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:03 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
wrote:
> On 1/12/21 2:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > The Kconfig logic around SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE tries to
> > ensure that all sound modules can be built with the minimal
> > dependencies, but this fails
From: Arnd Bergmann
The Kconfig logic around SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE tries to
ensure that all sound modules can be built with the minimal
dependencies, but this fails in some configurations:
x86_64-linux-ld: sound/hda/intel-dsp-config.o: in function
`snd_intel_dsp_driver_probe':
On 1/12/21 2:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann
The Kconfig logic around SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE tries to
ensure that all sound modules can be built with the minimal
dependencies, but this fails in some configurations:
x86_64-linux-ld: sound/hda/intel-dsp-config.o: in
4 matches
Mail list logo