Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: intel: fix soundwire dependencies

2021-01-13 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:36:15PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I was indeed wondering whether the intel-dsp-config.c is just > another layering violation: this is another generic piece > of code that seems to contain too much knowledge about > specific hardware implementations. The purpose of

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: intel: fix soundwire dependencies

2021-01-12 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:03 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 1/12/21 2:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > From: Arnd Bergmann > > > > The Kconfig logic around SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE tries to > > ensure that all sound modules can be built with the minimal > > dependencies, but this fails

[PATCH 2/2] ASoC: intel: fix soundwire dependencies

2021-01-12 Thread Arnd Bergmann
From: Arnd Bergmann The Kconfig logic around SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE tries to ensure that all sound modules can be built with the minimal dependencies, but this fails in some configurations: x86_64-linux-ld: sound/hda/intel-dsp-config.o: in function `snd_intel_dsp_driver_probe':

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: intel: fix soundwire dependencies

2021-01-12 Thread Pierre-Louis Bossart
On 1/12/21 2:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: From: Arnd Bergmann The Kconfig logic around SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE tries to ensure that all sound modules can be built with the minimal dependencies, but this fails in some configurations: x86_64-linux-ld: sound/hda/intel-dsp-config.o: in