On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What are your thoughts about inclusion of Mel's allocator work on -mm ?
>
> It's sitting in my to-do pile.
Tell me when you need my prezeroing patches on top of mel's patches
-
To unsubscribe from
Hi Andrew,
What are your thoughts about inclusion of Mel's allocator work on -mm ?
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:31:36AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> > > > Would it not be better to zero the global
Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What are your thoughts about inclusion of Mel's allocator work on -mm ?
It's sitting in my to-do pile.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are your thoughts about inclusion of Mel's allocator work on -mm ?
It's sitting in my to-do pile.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hi Andrew,
What are your thoughts about inclusion of Mel's allocator work on -mm ?
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:31:36AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
Would it not be better to zero the global 2^MAX_ORDER
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are your thoughts about inclusion of Mel's allocator work on -mm ?
It's sitting in my to-do pile.
Tell me when you need my prezeroing patches on top of mel's patches
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > > Would it not be better to zero the global 2^MAX_ORDER pages by the scrub
> > > daemon and have a global zeroed page list? That way you may avoid zeroing
> > > when splitting pages?
> > >
> >
> > Maybe,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Would it not be better to zero the global 2^MAX_ORDER pages by the scrub
> > daemon and have a global zeroed page list? That way you may avoid zeroing
> > when splitting pages?
> >
>
> Maybe, but right now when there are no 2^MAX_ORDER pages, the scrub
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > This is a patch that makes a step towards tieing the modified allocator
> > for reducing fragmentation with the prezeroing of pages that is based
> > on a discussion with Christoph. When a block has to be
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This is a patch that makes a step towards tieing the modified allocator
> for reducing fragmentation with the prezeroing of pages that is based
> on a discussion with Christoph. When a block has to be split to satisfy a
> zero-page, both buddies are zero'd,
Changelog V1
o Initial release
This is a patch that makes a step towards tieing the modified allocator
for reducing fragmentation with the prezeroing of pages that is based
on a discussion with Christoph. When a block has to be split to satisfy a
zero-page, both buddies are zero'd, one is
Changelog V1
o Initial release
This is a patch that makes a step towards tieing the modified allocator
for reducing fragmentation with the prezeroing of pages that is based
on a discussion with Christoph. When a block has to be split to satisfy a
zero-page, both buddies are zero'd, one is
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
This is a patch that makes a step towards tieing the modified allocator
for reducing fragmentation with the prezeroing of pages that is based
on a discussion with Christoph. When a block has to be split to satisfy a
zero-page, both buddies are zero'd, one
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
This is a patch that makes a step towards tieing the modified allocator
for reducing fragmentation with the prezeroing of pages that is based
on a discussion with Christoph. When a block has to be split to
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
Would it not be better to zero the global 2^MAX_ORDER pages by the scrub
daemon and have a global zeroed page list? That way you may avoid zeroing
when splitting pages?
Maybe, but right now when there are no 2^MAX_ORDER pages, the scrub daemon
is
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
Would it not be better to zero the global 2^MAX_ORDER pages by the scrub
daemon and have a global zeroed page list? That way you may avoid zeroing
when splitting pages?
Maybe, but right now when
16 matches
Mail list logo
