Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / runtime: Rework pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume()

2018-01-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, January 12, 2018 2:59:38 PM CET Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 12 January 2018 at 14:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > One of the limitations of pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() is that > > if a parent driver wants to use these functions, all of its child > > d

Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / runtime: Rework pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume()

2018-01-12 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 12 January 2018 at 14:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > One of the limitations of pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() is that > if a parent driver wants to use these functions, all of its child > drivers generally have to do that too because of the parent usage > counter

[PATCH 2/2] PM / runtime: Rework pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume()

2018-01-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki One of the limitations of pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() is that if a parent driver wants to use these functions, all of its child drivers generally have to do that too because of the parent usage counter manipulations necessary to get the correct state of the parent du