On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:11:34 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:20:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > If you do
> >
> > - int "Kernel stack size order"
> > + int
> >
> > then this rule will no longer be offered to the user and `make oldconfig'
> >
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:20:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> If you do
>
> - int "Kernel stack size order"
> + int
>
> then this rule will no longer be offered to the user and `make oldconfig'
> (actually anythingconfig) will override whatever happens to be in .config
> for
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:20:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
If you do
- int Kernel stack size order
+ int
then this rule will no longer be offered to the user and `make oldconfig'
(actually anythingconfig) will override whatever happens to be in .config
for KERNEL_STACK_ORDER.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:11:34 -0400 Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:20:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
If you do
- int Kernel stack size order
+ int
then this rule will no longer be offered to the user and `make oldconfig'
(actually
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:37:52 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:00:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400
> > Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [ This is 2.6.22 material ]
> > >
> > > Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:00:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400
> Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [ This is 2.6.22 material ]
> >
> > Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by
> > Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ This is 2.6.22 material ]
>
> Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by
> Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants 2 page stacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --
>
[ This is 2.6.22 material ]
Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by
Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants 2 page stacks.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
arch/um/defconfig |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Index:
[ This is 2.6.22 material ]
Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by
Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants 2 page stacks.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
arch/um/defconfig |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Index:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400
Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ This is 2.6.22 material ]
Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by
Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants 2 page stacks.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:00:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400
Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ This is 2.6.22 material ]
Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by
Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants 2 page
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:37:52 -0400 Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:00:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400
Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ This is 2.6.22 material ]
Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides
12 matches
Mail list logo