On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 04:37:48PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I happen to think that the fact that the TAB cannot compel where it
> > cannot persuade is a huge strength of the system because it means
> > there's no power structure to subvert if someone were interested in
> > using it to try to
Em Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:09:48 +0100
Alan Cox escreveu:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:19:17 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > Em Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:53:08 +0100
> > Alan Cox escreveu:
> >
> > > > -Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or
> > > > reject
> > > > +M
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:19:17 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:53:08 +0100
> Alan Cox escreveu:
>
> > > -Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
> > > +Maintainers may remove, edit, or reject
> > > comments, commits, code, wiki edits,
Em Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:53:08 +0100
Alan Cox escreveu:
> > -Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
> > +Maintainers may remove, edit, or reject
> > comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that
> > are
> > not aligned to this Code of
> -Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
> +Maintainers may remove, edit, or reject
> comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
> not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any
> contributor for
Em Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:37:31 -0700
James Bottomley escreveu:
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
> enfo
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:15:25PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2018, at 17:37, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities
> > outlined in
> > the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is
> > concern
> > that this becom
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
>
> On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 17:58 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 13:51 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > >
On 6 Oct 2018, at 17:37, James Bottomley wrote:
Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities
outlined in
the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is
concern
that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
enforcement clauses to
On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 17:58 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Bottomley
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 13:51 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: James Bottomley
> > > > On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
>
> On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 13:51 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
> > > On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: J
> I happen to think that the fact that the TAB cannot compel where it
> cannot persuade is a huge strength of the system because it means
> there's no power structure to subvert if someone were interested in
> using it to try to impose their own viewpoint on the community. But
> that's just my o
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:51 AM wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Bottomley
> > On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: James Bottomley
> > > >
> > > > Significant concern has been expressed about the res
On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 13:51 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Bottomley
> > On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: James Bottomley
> > > >
> > > > Significant concern has been expres
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
> On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
> > >
> > > Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities
> > > outlined in the enforcement clause o
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:37 PM James Bottomley
wrote:
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
> enforcement
On 10/06/2018 02:37 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
enforcement clauses to giv
On 10/06/2018 03:37 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
> enforcement clauses
On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 21:43 +, tim.b...@sony.com wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Bottomley
> >
> > Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities
> > outlined in the enforcement clause of the new code of
> > conduct. Since there is concern that this be
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley
>
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
> enforcement
Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in
the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern
that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
enforcement clauses to give the community time to consider and debate how t
21 matches
Mail list logo