On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:35:39AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc warns that the length for the extra unaligned data in the hash
> function may be used unaligned. In theory this could happen if
> we pass a zero-length sg_list, or if sg_is_last() was never true:
>
> In file included from
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:35:39AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc warns that the length for the extra unaligned data in the hash
> function may be used unaligned. In theory this could happen if
> we pass a zero-length sg_list, or if sg_is_last() was never true:
>
> In file included from
gcc warns that the length for the extra unaligned data in the hash
function may be used unaligned. In theory this could happen if
we pass a zero-length sg_list, or if sg_is_last() was never true:
In file included from drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c:23:
drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c: In
gcc warns that the length for the extra unaligned data in the hash
function may be used unaligned. In theory this could happen if
we pass a zero-length sg_list, or if sg_is_last() was never true:
In file included from drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c:23:
drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c: In
4 matches
Mail list logo
