On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:00:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 06:15:58PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> > Since we are using ipu_plane_init() to add one primary plane for each
> > IPU CRTC, it's unnecessary to create the safe one by using the helper
> > create_primary_plane().
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 06:15:58PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> Since we are using ipu_plane_init() to add one primary plane for each
> IPU CRTC, it's unnecessary to create the safe one by using the helper
> create_primary_plane().
>
> Furthermore, the safe one is attached to crtc->primary, which actu
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:05:48AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2015, 18:15 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> > Since we are using ipu_plane_init() to add one primary plane for each
> > IPU CRTC, it's unnecessary to create the safe one by using the helper
> > create_primary_plane().
Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2015, 18:15 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> Since we are using ipu_plane_init() to add one primary plane for each
> IPU CRTC, it's unnecessary to create the safe one by using the helper
> create_primary_plane().
>
> Furthermore, the safe one is attached to crtc->primary, which act
Since we are using ipu_plane_init() to add one primary plane for each
IPU CRTC, it's unnecessary to create the safe one by using the helper
create_primary_plane().
Furthermore, the safe one is attached to crtc->primary, which actually
carries a framebuffer(crtc->primary->fb) created by the fbdev h
5 matches
Mail list logo