On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:35:44AM +0100, Eric Curtin wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> For all those int ret declarations. Why not declare and initialize all
> on the same line?
>
> Regards,
> Eric
Because the return value 'ret' is set unconditionally later in the function as
part of a call into the DAX co
On Tue 13-10-15 11:33:20, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:07:12AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 12-10-15 15:41:35, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:07:12AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 12-10-15 15:41:35, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > > Add locking to ensure that DAX faults are isolated
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:24:28AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 03:41:35PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > > Add locking to ensure that DAX
On Mon 12-10-15 15:41:35, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > Add locking to ensure that DAX faults are isolated from ext2 operations
> > > that modify the data blocks allocation
On 13 October 2015 at 00:24, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 03:41:35PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > > Add locking to ensure that DAX faults are
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 03:41:35PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > Add locking to ensure that DAX faults are isolated from ext2 operations
> > > that modify the data bl
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> <>
> > > +/*
> > > + * The lock ordering for ext2 DAX fault paths is:
> > > + *
> > > + * mmap_sem (MM)
>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Add locking to ensure that DAX faults are isolated from ext2 operations
> > that modify the data blocks allocation for an inode. This is intended to
> > be analogous to
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [Nit: please send all patches of the series to the same list of
> recipients. Otherwise people with list based filters end up with the
> series spread across different mailboxes and people not subscribed
> to all lists don't get the fu
[Nit: please send all patches of the series to the same list of
recipients. Otherwise people with list based filters end up with the
series spread across different mailboxes and people not subscribed
to all lists don't get the full series and so are lacking in context
for proper review. ]
On Fri,
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:18:11PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Ross Zwisler
> wrote:
> > Add locking to ensure that DAX faults are isolated from ext2 operations
> > that modify the data blocks allocation for an inode. This is intended to
> > be analogous to the wo
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Ross Zwisler
wrote:
> Add locking to ensure that DAX faults are isolated from ext2 operations
> that modify the data blocks allocation for an inode. This is intended to
> be analogous to the work being done in XFS by Dave Chinner:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/l
Add locking to ensure that DAX faults are isolated from ext2 operations
that modify the data blocks allocation for an inode. This is intended to
be analogous to the work being done in XFS by Dave Chinner:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg90260.html
Compared with XFS the ext2 case is
14 matches
Mail list logo
