Sorry, please ignore this patch.
2013-05-08 (수), 09:56 +0900, Jaegeuk Kim:
> This mechanism revealed two issues: bug and performance.
>
> Now, iput() doesn't guarantee that the inode is freed completely due to the
> linked f2fs_drop_inode().
> So, in the case of failure on f2fs_new_inode(), we
This mechanism revealed two issues: bug and performance.
Now, iput() doesn't guarantee that the inode is freed completely due to the
linked f2fs_drop_inode().
So, in the case of failure on f2fs_new_inode(), we should not add the free nid
again to the list even though iput() is called before then.
This mechanism revealed two issues: bug and performance.
Now, iput() doesn't guarantee that the inode is freed completely due to the
linked f2fs_drop_inode().
So, in the case of failure on f2fs_new_inode(), we should not add the free nid
again to the list even though iput() is called before then.
Sorry, please ignore this patch.
2013-05-08 (수), 09:56 +0900, Jaegeuk Kim:
This mechanism revealed two issues: bug and performance.
Now, iput() doesn't guarantee that the inode is freed completely due to the
linked f2fs_drop_inode().
So, in the case of failure on f2fs_new_inode(), we should
4 matches
Mail list logo