On Sun 14-02-16 19:15:23, Jeff Layton wrote:
> We don't require a dedicated thread for fsnotify cleanup. Switch it over
> to a workqueue job instead that runs on the system_unbound_wq.
>
> In the interest of not thrashing the queued job too often when there are
> a lot of marks being removed, we d
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:03:10 +0800
Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:15:23PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > We don't require a dedicated thread for fsnotify cleanup. Switch it over
> > to a workqueue job instead that runs on the system_unbound_wq.
> >
> > In the interest of not thrash
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:15:23PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> We don't require a dedicated thread for fsnotify cleanup. Switch it over
> to a workqueue job instead that runs on the system_unbound_wq.
>
> In the interest of not thrashing the queued job too often when there are
> a lot of marks bei
We don't require a dedicated thread for fsnotify cleanup. Switch it over
to a workqueue job instead that runs on the system_unbound_wq.
In the interest of not thrashing the queued job too often when there are
a lot of marks being removed, we delay the reaper job slightly when
queueing it, to allow
4 matches
Mail list logo
