On 22 September 2018 12:48:49 BST, Himanshu Jha
wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:36:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:03 +0800
>> kbuild test robot wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Eugen,
>> This one is leaving me stumped...
>>
>> Anyone care to point out what I'm missing
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:36:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:03 +0800
> kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> > Hi Eugen,
> This one is leaving me stumped...
>
> Anyone care to point out what I'm missing that is wrong here?
>
> Also Eugen, please don't cc stable on a pat
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:36:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:03 +0800
> kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> > Hi Eugen,
> This one is leaving me stumped...
>
> Anyone care to point out what I'm missing that is wrong here?
>
> Also Eugen, please don't cc stable on a pat
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:03 +0800
kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Eugen,
This one is leaving me stumped...
Anyone care to point out what I'm missing that is wrong here?
Also Eugen, please don't cc stable on a patch directly. It is fine to send
a backport request once a patch has hit mainline, b
Hi Eugen,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on iio/togreg]
[also build test WARNING on v4.19-rc4 next-20180919]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/co
When channels are registered, the hardware channel number is not the
actual iio channel number.
This is because the driver is probed with a certain number of accessible
channels. Some pins are routed and some not, depending on the description of
the board in the DT.
Because of that, channels 0,1,2,
6 matches
Mail list logo