On November 8, 2016 4:56:54 PM PST, Kees Cook wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Josh Triplett
>wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:40:02PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Josh Triplett
> wrote:
>>> > Some embedded systems can do without the prctl syscall, saving
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:40:02PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> > Some embedded systems can do without the prctl syscall, saving some
>> > space.
>> >
>> > This also avoids regular increas
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:40:02PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Some embedded systems can do without the prctl syscall, saving some
> > space.
> >
> > This also avoids regular increases in tinyconfig size as people add more
> > non-optional fun
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Some embedded systems can do without the prctl syscall, saving some
> space.
>
> This also avoids regular increases in tinyconfig size as people add more
> non-optional functionality to prctl (observed via the 0-day kernel
> infrastructure).
>
Some embedded systems can do without the prctl syscall, saving some
space.
This also avoids regular increases in tinyconfig size as people add more
non-optional functionality to prctl (observed via the 0-day kernel
infrastructure).
bloat-o-meter results:
add/remove: 0/3 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down:
5 matches
Mail list logo