On Sun, 26 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 04/15/15 at 01:58P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
> >
> > > On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, the function name can be
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/15/15 at 01:58P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
Yes, the function name can be changed, before the extra
On 04/15/15 at 01:58P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
>
> > On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, the function name can be changed, before the extra module is
> > > > installed to
On 04/15/15 at 01:58P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
Yes, the function name can be changed, before the extra module is
installed to the production system.
On 04/15/15 at 12:24pm, Justin Keller wrote:
> I agree that 128+ function names are bad and there is no need for such
> long names, epically for compatibility with 80 char/line displays. I
> cannot think of an example even near as long as 127 characters. Are
> there even such long function names
I agree that 128+ function names are bad and there is no need for such
long names, epically for compatibility with 80 char/line displays. I
cannot think of an example even near as long as 127 characters. Are
there even such long function names anywhere in the kernel?
Justin
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Yes, the function name can be changed, before the extra module is
> > > installed to the production system.
> > >
> > > We discuss around and
On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, the function name can be changed, before the extra module is
> > installed to the production system.
> >
> > We discuss around and around, there are still some confusion with it.
> >
> > 1)
On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the function name can be changed, before the extra module is
> > installed to the production system.
> >
> > We discuss around and around, there are still some confusion with it.
> >
> > 1) How
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 04/14/15 at 08:41pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Wed 2015-04-15 01:01:39, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > On 04/14/15 at 06:27pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > > > On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
Yes, the function name can be changed, before the extra module is
installed to the production system.
We discuss around and around, there are still
I agree that 128+ function names are bad and there is no need for such
long names, epically for compatibility with 80 char/line displays. I
cannot think of an example even near as long as 127 characters. Are
there even such long function names anywhere in the kernel?
Justin
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015
On 04/15/15 at 12:24pm, Justin Keller wrote:
I agree that 128+ function names are bad and there is no need for such
long names, epically for compatibility with 80 char/line displays. I
cannot think of an example even near as long as 127 characters. Are
there even such long function names
On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
Yes, the function name can be changed, before the extra module is
installed to the production system.
We discuss around and around, there are still some confusion with it.
1) How does end user
On 04/15/15 at 10:30P, Miroslav Benes wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
Yes, the function name can be changed, before the extra module is
installed to the production system.
We discuss around and around, there are still some confusion with it.
1) How does end user
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 08:41pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Wed 2015-04-15 01:01:39, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 06:27pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue,
On 04/14/15 at 08:41pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2015-04-15 01:01:39, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > On 04/14/15 at 06:27pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > > On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800,
On Wed 2015-04-15 01:01:39, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 04/14/15 at 06:27pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > > > On 04/14/15 at 12:32P,
On 04/14/15 at 06:27pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > > On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at
On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For end user, they may know litter about restriction of
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > >
> > > For end user, they may know litter about restriction of kallsyms and
> > > livepatch. How can they know the
On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
For end user,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
For end user, they may know litter about restriction of kallsyms and
livepatch. How can they know the restriction
On 04/14/15 at 06:27pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM
On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
For end user, they may know litter about restriction of kallsyms and
On 04/14/15 at 08:41pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Wed 2015-04-15 01:01:39, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 06:27pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang
On Wed 2015-04-15 01:01:39, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 06:27pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Tue 2015-04-14 23:55:36, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 10:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:45:49PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf
On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > On 04/14/15 at 12:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > > On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > > On Tue,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 04/14/15 at 12:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
>
On 04/14/15 at 12:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > > On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > > On Sun,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
>
On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > > For now, the kallsyms will only store the first
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
> > > kallsyms name is same for the function
On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
> > kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
> > same, but the rest is not.
> >
>
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
> kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
> same, but the rest is not.
>
> Then function will never be patched, although function
On 04/13/15 at 10:44P, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Sun 2015-04-12 21:15:54, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
> > kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
> > same, but the rest is not.
> >
> > Then function
On Sun 2015-04-12 21:15:54, Minfei Huang wrote:
> For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
> kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
> same, but the rest is not.
>
> Then function will never be patched, although function name and
On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
same, but the rest is not.
Then
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
same, but the rest is not.
Then function will never be patched, although function name
On 04/14/15 at 12:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at
On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 12:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On
On 04/14/15 at 12:32P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:29:50PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/14/15 at 12:11P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/13/15 at 11:57P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
For
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:26:29AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
On 04/13/15 at 06:13P, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:15:54PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
kallsyms name is same for the function which
On Sun 2015-04-12 21:15:54, Minfei Huang wrote:
For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
same, but the rest is not.
Then function will never be patched, although function name and address
On 04/13/15 at 10:44P, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Sun 2015-04-12 21:15:54, Minfei Huang wrote:
For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
same, but the rest is not.
Then function will never
For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
same, but the rest is not.
Then function will never be patched, although function name and address
are provided both. The reason caused this bug is
For now, the kallsyms will only store the first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1). The
kallsyms name is same for the function which first (KSYM_NAME_LEN-1) is
same, but the rest is not.
Then function will never be patched, although function name and address
are provided both. The reason caused this bug is
50 matches
Mail list logo
