On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 09:39:24PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:03:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > I suspect the vast majority of the time is spent calling
> > > > alloc_pages_node()
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:07:22PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:39:48PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:39:13PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 202
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:03:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > I suspect the vast majority of the time is spent calling
> > > alloc_pages_node()
> > > 1024 times. Have you looked at Mel's patch to do ... well, exactly
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:39:48PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:39:13PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:03:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > I suspect the vast
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:39:13PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:03:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > I suspect the vast majority of the time is spent calling
> > > alloc_pages_node()
> > > 1024
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:03:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > I suspect the vast majority of the time is spent calling alloc_pages_node()
> > 1024 times. Have you looked at Mel's patch to do ... well, exactly what
> > vmallo
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:03:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 07:38:20PM +, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > > If we're trying to allocate 4MB of memory, the table will be 8KiB in size
> > > (102
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 07:38:20PM +, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > If we're trying to allocate 4MB of memory, the table will be 8KiB in size
> > (1024 pointers * 8 bytes per pointer), which can usually be satisfied
> > by
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 07:38:20PM +, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> If we're trying to allocate 4MB of memory, the table will be 8KiB in size
> (1024 pointers * 8 bytes per pointer), which can usually be satisfied
> by a kmalloc (which is significantly faster). Instead of changing this
> op
If we're trying to allocate 4MB of memory, the table will be 8KiB in size
(1024 pointers * 8 bytes per pointer), which can usually be satisfied
by a kmalloc (which is significantly faster). Instead of changing this
open-coded implementation, just use kvmalloc().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Ora
10 matches
Mail list logo