On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 8:05 PM Xu, Yanfei wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/6/21 10:51 AM, Xu, Yanfei wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/6/21 2:20 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
> >> [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 8:33 AM wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Yanfei Xu
> >>>
> >>>
On 4/6/21 10:51 AM, Xu, Yanfei wrote:
On 4/6/21 2:20 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 8:33 AM wrote:
From: Yanfei Xu
We could check MMF_DISABLE_THP ahead of iterating over all of vma.
Otherwise if some mm_struct c
On 4/6/21 2:20 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 8:33 AM wrote:
From: Yanfei Xu
We could check MMF_DISABLE_THP ahead of iterating over all of vma.
Otherwise if some mm_struct contain a large number of vma, there will
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 8:33 AM wrote:
>
> From: Yanfei Xu
>
> We could check MMF_DISABLE_THP ahead of iterating over all of vma.
> Otherwise if some mm_struct contain a large number of vma, there will
> be amounts meaningless cpu cycles cost.
>
> BTW, drop an unnecessary cond_resched(), because t
From: Yanfei Xu
We could check MMF_DISABLE_THP ahead of iterating over all of vma.
Otherwise if some mm_struct contain a large number of vma, there will
be amounts meaningless cpu cycles cost.
BTW, drop an unnecessary cond_resched(), because there is a another
cond_resched() followed it and no c
5 matches
Mail list logo
