> >> This reverts commit c42deffd5b53c9e583d83c7964854ede2f12410d.
> >>
> >> commit did use
> >> mutex_unlock() in tasklet, but mutex_unlock() can't used in
> >> tasklet(atomic context). The driver need use mutex to avoid concurrency,
> >> so we can't use tasklet here, the patch need to be removed
On 29 April 2014 09:36, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 29 April 2014 03:54, wrote:
>> From: Micky Ching
>>
>> This reverts commit c42deffd5b53c9e583d83c7964854ede2f12410d.
>>
>> commit did use
>> mutex_unlock() in tasklet, but mutex_unlock() can't used in
>> tasklet(atomic context). The driver need u
On 29 April 2014 03:54, wrote:
> From: Micky Ching
>
> This reverts commit c42deffd5b53c9e583d83c7964854ede2f12410d.
>
> commit did use
> mutex_unlock() in tasklet, but mutex_unlock() can't used in
> tasklet(atomic context). The driver need use mutex to avoid concurrency,
> so we can't use task
From: Micky Ching
This reverts commit c42deffd5b53c9e583d83c7964854ede2f12410d.
commit did use
mutex_unlock() in tasklet, but mutex_unlock() can't used in
tasklet(atomic context). The driver need use mutex to avoid concurrency,
so we can't use tasklet here, the patch need to be removed.
The sp
4 matches
Mail list logo