On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:53:28PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> new_pcichild_device() is not called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up at new_pcichild_device() is:
> [1] new_pcichild_device() <- pci_devices_present_work()
> pci_devices_present_work() is only set in INIT_WORK().
>
>
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:53:28PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> new_pcichild_device() is not called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up at new_pcichild_device() is:
> [1] new_pcichild_device() <- pci_devices_present_work()
> pci_devices_present_work() is only set in INIT_WORK().
>
>
Looks ok.
regards,
dan carpenter
Looks ok.
regards,
dan carpenter
oft.com>; Stephen
> Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>; bhelg...@google.com
> Cc: de...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pci: host: pci-hyperv: Replace GFP_ATOMIC wi
.@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Jia-Ju Bai
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pci: host: pci-hyperv: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with
> GFP_KERNEL in
> new_pcichild_device
>
> new_pcichild_device() is not called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up
new_pcichild_device() is not called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at new_pcichild_device() is:
[1] new_pcichild_device() <- pci_devices_present_work()
pci_devices_present_work() is only set in INIT_WORK().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
new_pcichild_device()
new_pcichild_device() is not called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at new_pcichild_device() is:
[1] new_pcichild_device() <- pci_devices_present_work()
pci_devices_present_work() is only set in INIT_WORK().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
new_pcichild_device()
8 matches
Mail list logo