Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-07-28 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Thomas, On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:11:05 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote: > Hi Namhyung, > I'm thinking about something like below.. but sadly it doesn't work for me.. hmm. >>> >>> Actually this appears to work for me (with 2.6.9 & 2.7.6) and I >>> find this solution more >>> elegant. >> >>

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-07-28 Thread Thomas Ilsche
Hi Namhyung, >>> I'm thinking about something like below.. but sadly it doesn't work for >>> me.. hmm. >> >> Actually this appears to work for me (with 2.6.9 & 2.7.6) and I >> find this solution more >> elegant. > > Thanks for testing. It was my fault on setting symlink to a > non-existing file

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-07-27 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Thomas, On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:43:24 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote: > Hi Namhyung, > > apologies for mixing up your first name earlier. It's okay, nevermind. :) > On 2014-07-25 12:24, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:55 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote: >>> ifndef NO_LIBPYTHON >>> -

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-07-25 Thread Thomas Ilsche
Hi Namhyung, apologies for mixing up your first name earlier. On 2014-07-25 12:24, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:55 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote: >> Hi Kim, >> >> On 2014-07-25 05:14, Namhyung Kim wrote: >>> According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portab

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-07-25 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Thomas, On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:55 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote: > Hi Kim, > > On 2014-07-25 05:14, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portable to use >> python2 rather than plain python to refer python binary version 2. > > I tried to find out how backwar

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-07-25 Thread Thomas Ilsche
Hi Kim, On 2014-07-25 05:14, Namhyung Kim wrote: > According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portable to use > python2 rather than plain python to refer python binary version 2. I tried to find out how backwards-compatible this is. python2(-config) was first available in Python 2.7.3 (Ap

[PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Default to python version 2

2014-07-24 Thread Namhyung Kim
According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portable to use python2 rather than plain python to refer python binary version 2. Since there're distros using python3 by default like Arch, and we don't support python3 (yet), it'd be better using python2 explicitly. [1] https://www.python.org/