On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 13:46 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yunfeng Ye
> wrote:
> > It's not a good way to access the phys_proc_id of cpuinfo directly.
> > So using topology_physical_package_id(cpu) instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye
>
> Srinivas,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>
> It's not a good way to access the phys_proc_id of cpuinfo directly.
> So using topology_physical_package_id(cpu) instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye
Srinivas, Rui, any concerns?
> ---
> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 2 +-
> 1
It's not a good way to access the phys_proc_id of cpuinfo directly.
So using topology_physical_package_id(cpu) instead.
Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye
---
drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
3 matches
Mail list logo