On Thu, 3 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well that's the "locking" protocol then: each instance of this structure is
> only ever touched by a single thread, yes?
Yes. Each do_revoke() call creates a new instance.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the bo
On Thu, 3 May 2007 23:32:28 +0300 (EEST)
Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * fileset - an array of file pointers.
> > > + * @files:the array of file pointers
> > > + * @nr: number of elements in the array
> > >
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * fileset - an array of file pointers.
> > + * @files:the array of file pointers
> > + * @nr: number of elements in the array
> > + * @end: index to next unused file pointer
> > + */
> > +struct fileset {
> > + struct
On Thu, 3 May 2007 17:53:07 +0300 (EEST)
Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The revoke_table struct is overloaded because it serves two purposes:
> it manages the pre-allocated set of files and tracks the revoke
> operation so that we know where
From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The revoke_table struct is overloaded because it serves two purposes:
it manages the pre-allocated set of files and tracks the revoke
operation so that we know where to start restore if the operation
fails. This splits file set management to separate struct f
5 matches
Mail list logo