Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: megaraid: Track the page allocations for struct fusion_context

2017-10-31 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Yisheng, >> Do you still see leaks reported with the megaraid driver update recently >> merged into 4.15/scsi-queue? >> > No, the related code have been optimized and __get_free_pages is not used > to allocate fusion_context anymore. So, please ignore this one, and sorry > for disturbing. > > BT

Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: megaraid: Track the page allocations for struct fusion_context

2017-10-27 Thread Yisheng Xie
hi Martin , On 2017/10/25 20:36, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Yisheng, > >> I have get many kmemleak reports just similar to commit 70c54e210ee9 >> (scsi: megaraid_sas: fix memleak in megasas_alloc_cmdlist_fusion) >> on v4.14-rc6, however it seems have a different stroy: > > Do you still see l

Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: megaraid: Track the page allocations for struct fusion_context

2017-10-25 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Yisheng, > I have get many kmemleak reports just similar to commit 70c54e210ee9 > (scsi: megaraid_sas: fix memleak in megasas_alloc_cmdlist_fusion) > on v4.14-rc6, however it seems have a different stroy: Do you still see leaks reported with the megaraid driver update recently merged into 4.15/s

[PATCH 2/2] scsi: megaraid: Track the page allocations for struct fusion_context

2017-10-25 Thread Yisheng Xie
I have get many kmemleak reports just similar to commit 70c54e210ee9 (scsi: megaraid_sas: fix memleak in megasas_alloc_cmdlist_fusion) on v4.14-rc6, however it seems have a different stroy: unreferenced object 0x8b5139d9d2c0 (size 192): comm "kworker/0:0", pid 3, jiffies 4294689182 (age 1134