Hi Chris,
On 20 June 2017 at 17:17, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Sumit Semwal (2017-06-19 16:11:33)
>> On 19 June 2017 at 20:27, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> > Quoting Sumit Semwal (2017-06-19 15:46:20)
>> >> Hi Chris,
>> >>
>> >> On 19 June 2017 at 19:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> >> > Quoting Sumit S
On 19 June 2017 at 20:27, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Sumit Semwal (2017-06-19 15:46:20)
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On 19 June 2017 at 19:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> > Quoting Sumit Semwal (2017-06-19 14:44:32)
>> >> The test for prime numbers doesn't differentiate between missing
>> >> prime_numbers.ko
Hi Chris,
On 19 June 2017 at 19:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Sumit Semwal (2017-06-19 14:44:32)
>> The test for prime numbers doesn't differentiate between missing
>> prime_numbers.ko and failure in prime_numbers.ko.
>>
>> Update it to check for presence of the file itself to skip, therefore
Quoting Sumit Semwal (2017-06-19 14:44:32)
> The test for prime numbers doesn't differentiate between missing
> prime_numbers.ko and failure in prime_numbers.ko.
>
> Update it to check for presence of the file itself to skip, therefore
> correctly exercising the test failure case.
modprobe -r sho
The test for prime numbers doesn't differentiate between missing
prime_numbers.ko and failure in prime_numbers.ko.
Update it to check for presence of the file itself to skip, therefore
correctly exercising the test failure case.
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
---
tools/testing/selftests/lib/prime_
5 matches
Mail list logo