Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-15 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Bryant, > VMs do not remove the I_T nexus while the VM is active, so we can remove > the target_wait_for_sess_cmd() call. Patch forthcoming? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-15 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Bryant, > VMs do not remove the I_T nexus while the VM is active, so we can remove > the target_wait_for_sess_cmd() call. Patch forthcoming? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-11 Thread Ly, Bryant
> On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:56 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger > wrote: > > Hello MNC & Co, > > On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 11:58 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: >> On 10/09/2018 10:23 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >>> From: Nicholas Bellinger >>> >>> With the addition of commit 00d909a107 in v4.19-rc,

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-11 Thread Ly, Bryant
> On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:56 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger > wrote: > > Hello MNC & Co, > > On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 11:58 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: >> On 10/09/2018 10:23 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >>> From: Nicholas Bellinger >>> >>> With the addition of commit 00d909a107 in v4.19-rc,

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-11 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:40:12PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Hey Peter & Co, > > On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 10:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:10AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > > > > > With the addition of commit

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-11 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:40:12PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Hey Peter & Co, > > On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 10:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:10AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > > > > > With the addition of commit

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-10 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hello MNC & Co, On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 11:58 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > On 10/09/2018 10:23 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > > > With the addition of commit 00d909a107 in v4.19-rc, it incorrectly assumes > > no > > signals will be pending for task_struct

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-10 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hello MNC & Co, On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 11:58 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > On 10/09/2018 10:23 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > > > With the addition of commit 00d909a107 in v4.19-rc, it incorrectly assumes > > no > > signals will be pending for task_struct

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-10 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hey Peter & Co, On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 10:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:10AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > > > With the addition of commit 00d909a107 in v4.19-rc, it incorrectly assumes > > no > > signals will be pending

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with active signals

2018-10-10 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hey Peter & Co, On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 10:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:10AM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > > > With the addition of commit 00d909a107 in v4.19-rc, it incorrectly assumes > > no > > signals will be pending