Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: test get_config_size DSM failures

2016-09-13 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Dan, [auto build test WARNING on next-20160913] [cannot apply to pm/linux-next linus/master linux/master v4.8-rc6 v4.8-rc5 v4.8-rc4 v4.8-rc6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=

Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: test get_config_size DSM failures

2016-09-13 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Dan, [auto build test WARNING on next-20160913] [cannot apply to pm/linux-next linus/master linux/master v4.8-rc6 v4.8-rc5 v4.8-rc4 v4.8-rc6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=

[PATCH 2/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: test get_config_size DSM failures

2016-09-13 Thread Dan Williams
Add an nfit_test specific attribute for gating whether a get_config_size DSM, or any DSM for that matter, succeeds or fails. The get_config_size DSM is initial motivation since that is the first command libnvdimm core issues to determine the state of the namespace label area. Signed-off-by: Dan

[PATCH 2/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: test get_config_size DSM failures

2016-09-13 Thread Dan Williams
Add an nfit_test specific attribute for gating whether a get_config_size DSM, or any DSM for that matter, succeeds or fails. The get_config_size DSM is initial motivation since that is the first command libnvdimm core issues to determine the state of the namespace label area. Signed-off-by: Dan