On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Heikki Krogerus
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +Dan and Guenter
>
> I'm sorry for the late reply. These slipped under my radar. I do
> have a one more proposal below, and a few nits..
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 01:22:48PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
>> At present, TCPM
Hi,
+Dan and Guenter
I'm sorry for the late reply. These slipped under my radar. I do
have a one more proposal below, and a few nits..
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 01:22:48PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports
> variable/batt pdos and alway
At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports
variable/batt pdos and always selects the pdo with highest
possible power within the board limit. This assumption
might not hold good for all devices. To overcome this,
this patch makes TCPM only accept a source_pdo when there is
a matching s
3 matches
Mail list logo