On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 06:53:52AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:35:57AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > This thread seems to have fallen through the cracks. Maybe now would be
> > a good time to address the problem (since we originally planned to fix
> > it in
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:35:57AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> This thread seems to have fallen through the cracks. Maybe now would be
> a good time to address the problem (since we originally planned to fix
> it in 5.11!).
>
> The questions listed below are pretty self-contained, although the
This thread seems to have fallen through the cracks. Maybe now would be
a good time to address the problem (since we originally planned to fix
it in 5.11!).
The questions listed below are pretty self-contained, although the rest
of the discussion isn't. But I never received any answers.
Alan
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:55:45PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/30/20 2:53 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 11/30/20 2:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede
[Added linux-scsi to CC: list. When discussing code in a particular
subsystem, it's a good idea to include that subsystem's mailing list in
the CC:.]
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:01:56AM +0800, Tom Yan wrote:
> For the record,
>
For the record,
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/scsi/scsi_host.h?h=v5.10-rc6#n753
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 02:57, Tom Yan wrote:
>
> This maybe?
>
This maybe?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c?h=v5.10-rc6#n1816
UAS:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c?h=v5.10-rc6#n918
BOT (AFAICT):
Hi,
On 11/30/20 6:20 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/30/20 2:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/30/20 1:58 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
> It's merely
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:20:04PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/fde7e11f-5dfc-8348-c134-a21cb1116...@redhat.com/T/#t
>
> It's hard to go wrong with reverting, so it's okay with me.
>
> Still, Hans, have you checked out the difference between the
>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/30/20 2:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 11/30/20 1:58 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
> >>> It's merely a moving of comment moving for/and a
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 21:23, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/30/20 1:58 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
>
> IMHO the revert of the troublesome commit and the other/new changes really
> should be 2 separate commits. But I will let Alan and Greg have the final
> verdict on this.
They are not
Hi,
On 11/30/20 2:53 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/30/20 2:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/30/20 1:58 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
> It's merely a
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/30/20 2:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 11/30/20 1:58 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
> >>> It's merely a moving of comment moving for/and a
Hi,
On 11/30/20 2:30 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/30/20 1:58 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
>>> It's merely a moving of comment moving for/and a no-behavioral-change
>>> adaptation for the reversion.>
>>
>> IMHO the revert of the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/30/20 1:58 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
> > It's merely a moving of comment moving for/and a no-behavioral-change
> > adaptation for the reversion.>
>
> IMHO the revert of the troublesome commit and the other/new changes really
Hi,
On 11/30/20 1:58 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
> It's merely a moving of comment moving for/and a no-behavioral-change
> adaptation for the reversion.>
IMHO the revert of the troublesome commit and the other/new changes really
should be 2 separate commits. But I will let Alan and Greg have the final
It's merely a moving of comment moving for/and a no-behavioral-change
adaptation for the reversion. Similar has been done in the equivalent
patch for the UAS driver (and the reason is stated there).
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 17:50, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/28/20 4:48 PM, Tom Yan
Hi,
On 11/28/20 4:48 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
> While the change only seemed to have caused issue on uas drives, we
> probably want to avoid it in the usb-storage driver as well, until
> we are sure it is the right thing to do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Yan
This seems to do a whole lot more then just
While the change only seemed to have caused issue on uas drives, we
probably want to avoid it in the usb-storage driver as well, until
we are sure it is the right thing to do.
Signed-off-by: Tom Yan
---
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 40 +-
19 matches
Mail list logo
