On 03/27/2017, 12:37 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> For some reason a handful of ISO-8859-1 symbols are excluded from "word
> chars" while the vast majority of Unicode is hard-coded as included, even
> when inappropriate (we really would want to _not_ select line-drawing/etc).
> Those symbols are:
On 03/27/2017, 12:37 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> For some reason a handful of ISO-8859-1 symbols are excluded from "word
> chars" while the vast majority of Unicode is hard-coded as included, even
> when inappropriate (we really would want to _not_ select line-drawing/etc).
> Those symbols are:
For some reason a handful of ISO-8859-1 symbols are excluded from "word
chars" while the vast majority of Unicode is hard-coded as included, even
when inappropriate (we really would want to _not_ select line-drawing/etc).
Those symbols are: ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬®¯°±²³´µ¶·¸¹º»¼½¾¿×÷
Thus, let's not
For some reason a handful of ISO-8859-1 symbols are excluded from "word
chars" while the vast majority of Unicode is hard-coded as included, even
when inappropriate (we really would want to _not_ select line-drawing/etc).
Those symbols are: ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬®¯°±²³´µ¶·¸¹º»¼½¾¿×÷
Thus, let's not
4 matches
Mail list logo
