* Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Is anyone going to pick this patch up?
Sure, I've picked it up with Bjorn's Acked-by and will push it out after
a bit of testing.
Thanks,
Ingo
Is anyone going to pick this patch up?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 07:18:49AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:45:01PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Keith, Jonathan (VMD guys)]
> >
> > I'm OK with this from a PCI perspective. It would be nice if
> >
> > dma_domain_list
> > dma_domain_list_lock
> >
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:45:01PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Keith, Jonathan (VMD guys)]
>
> I'm OK with this from a PCI perspective. It would be nice if
>
> dma_domain_list
> dma_domain_list_lock
> add_dma_domain()
> del_dma_domain()
> set_dma_domain_ops()
>
> could all be
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 16:45 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Keith, Jonathan (VMD guys)]
>
> I'm OK with this from a PCI perspective. It would be nice if
>
> dma_domain_list
> dma_domain_list_lock
> add_dma_domain()
> del_dma_domain()
> set_dma_domain_ops()
>
> could all be moved
[+cc Keith, Jonathan (VMD guys)]
I'm OK with this from a PCI perspective. It would be nice if
dma_domain_list
dma_domain_list_lock
add_dma_domain()
del_dma_domain()
set_dma_domain_ops()
could all be moved to vmd.c, since they're really only used there.
But we don't really have a
(+Cc. Patch quoted below. Acked-by from an x86 perspective.)
* Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We have supported per-device dma_map_ops in generic code for a long
> time, and this symbol just guards the inclusion of the dma_map_ops
> registry used for vmd. Stop enabling it for anything but vmd.
We have supported per-device dma_map_ops in generic code for a long
time, and this symbol just guards the inclusion of the dma_map_ops
registry used for vmd. Stop enabling it for anything but vmd.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 ---
8 matches
Mail list logo
