On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 10:25 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > [0.072367] x86: Booting node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 <--
> > [0.686329] x86: Booted up 1 node, 8 CPUs
^
> - Added nodes count to the 'Booted up' line. Since we count nodes and
>
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:25:42AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Could we, with another add-on patch, further compress the first half
> > of the output as well?
> >
> > Advanced output like this would be really cool:
>
> Sure.
>
> > > [0.074509] x86: Booting node
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:25:42AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Could we, with another add-on patch, further compress the first half
> of the output as well?
>
> Advanced output like this would be really cool:
Sure.
> > [0.074509] x86: Booting node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7
>
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> As the new x86 CPU bootup printout format code maintainer, I am taking
> immediate action to improve and clean (and thus indulge my OCD) the
> reporting of the cores when coming up online.
>
> Fix padding to a right-hand alignment, cleanup
From: Borislav Petkov
As the new x86 CPU bootup printout format code maintainer, I am taking
immediate action to improve and clean (and thus indulge my OCD) the
reporting of the cores when coming up online.
Fix padding to a right-hand alignment, cleanup code and bind reporting
width to the max n
5 matches
Mail list logo