On Mar 26, 2015 6:32 AM, "Boris Ostrovsky" wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2015 08:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> I broke 32-bit kernels. The implementation of sp0 was correct as
>> far as I can tell, but sp0 was much weirder on x86_32 than I
>> realized. It has the following issues:
>>
>> - Init's s
On 03/06/2015 08:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I broke 32-bit kernels. The implementation of sp0 was correct as
far as I can tell, but sp0 was much weirder on x86_32 than I
realized. It has the following issues:
- Init's sp0 is inconsistent with everything else's: non-init tasks
are offs
I broke 32-bit kernels. The implementation of sp0 was correct as
far as I can tell, but sp0 was much weirder on x86_32 than I
realized. It has the following issues:
- Init's sp0 is inconsistent with everything else's: non-init tasks
are offset by 8 bytes. (I have no idea why, and the commen
3 matches
Mail list logo