Hi Denis,
I found a couple issues with your second patch. There are non-PCI xHCI
host controllers, so we can't assume the xHCI host is a PCI host. So
this code can't run in the generic xHCI shutdown method:
> void xhci_shutdown(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> {
> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> + co
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:06:34AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:49:50AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Monday 30 July 2012 15:34:06 Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > > Hi Denis,
> > >
> > > Can you send me the output of `sudo dmidecode`? I'd like to see if I
> > > can make a mo
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:49:50AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Monday 30 July 2012 15:34:06 Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > Hi Denis,
> >
> > Can you send me the output of `sudo dmidecode`? I'd like to see if I
> > can make a more general patch apply to the Intense-PC.
>
> As this is for shutdown, w
Hi Sarah,
Attached dmidecode output of Intense-PC.
Denis Turischev
On 07/31/2012 01:34 AM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> Can you send me the output of `sudo dmidecode`? I'd like to see if I
> can make a more general patch apply to the Intense-PC.
>
> Sarah Sharp
>
# dmidecode 2.11
SMBI
On Monday 30 July 2012 15:34:06 Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> Can you send me the output of `sudo dmidecode`? I'd like to see if I
> can make a more general patch apply to the Intense-PC.
As this is for shutdown, why not all systems?
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscrib
Hi Denis,
Can you send me the output of `sudo dmidecode`? I'd like to see if I
can make a more general patch apply to the Intense-PC.
Sarah Sharp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info a
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:50:42AM +0300, Denis Turischev wrote:
> On 07/23/2012 08:44 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > Did you try disabling the wake on bits in the port status registers? I
> > would prefer that solution if it works.
> No, I didn't. Why we need to disable wake on capabilities?
My theo
On 07/23/2012 08:44 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Did you try disabling the wake on bits in the port status registers? I
> would prefer that solution if it works.
No, I didn't. Why we need to disable wake on capabilities?
>
> Otherwise this patchset looks fine. I'll work with the hardware folks
> and
Did you try disabling the wake on bits in the port status registers? I
would prefer that solution if it works.
Otherwise this patchset looks fine. I'll work with the hardware folks
and see if this is exposed on other boards. Also, this is not a BIOS
bug, but a hardware issue that can be worked
Intense-PC is Compulab's mini-desktop with Intel Panther Point
chipset.
Unconditional switchover to xHCI provided by function
usb_enable_xhci_ports() leads to surprising results, after shutdown
system powered-on again after a few seconds. On Windows power
related problems were not observed. Switch
10 matches
Mail list logo
